For quite some time now, commercial auto carriers have debated the notion that there is an inverse relationship between the subsidization of telematics program costs and program performance.

The idea is that if the insured is not paying for their telematics solution, then they have no skin in the game and will not invest as much discipline into the program as those that pay for their solution. This is the old adage about people not valuing things that they didn’t pay for.

Enter your email to read the full article.

Already a subscriber? Log in here