Pimco Shareholder Lawsuit Alleges Excessive Fees Boosted Exec Bonuses

January 15, 2015 by Karen Gullo and Mary Childs

Pacific Investment Management Co. will fight a lawsuit by a shareholder of its Pimco Total Return Fund alleging the company gouges investors with excessive advisory fees to support billion-dollar bonuses for top executives.

Pimco was sued Dec. 31 in Seattle federal court over claims that fees totaling $1.2 billion in 2013 are unfair and excessive, bear no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and couldn’t have been the product of arms length negotiations, according to the complaint.

Pimco breached its fiduciary duties to investors and should return fees and improper compensation to shareholders, investor Robert Kenny said in the complaint.

“Pimco believes this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself,” Agnes Crane, a Pimco spokeswoman, said today in an e-mail.

Pimco paid more than $1.5 billion in bonuses to top executives while the fund’s performance suffered, said Kenny of Clinton, Washington, who is being represented by attorneys at Keller Rohrback, a firm that has represented institutional investors in lawsuits over Libor manipulation and securities lending.

Bill Gross, who managed the Total Return Fund, the world’s biggest bond fund, left in September to join Janus Capital Group Inc. He received $290 million in bonus pay in 2013, Kenny said in the complaint

Gross Fired

Separately, Gross said Jan. 12 that he was fired, the first time he’s publicly confirmed that he was dismissed from the Newport Beach, California-based firm he co-founded in 1971.

In 2013, the fund lost 1.92 percent and trailed 70 percent of its peers in its worst performance since 1994, according to the complaint.

The fund stumbled when the Federal Reserve hinted it would unwind stimulus measures, sparking client redemptions. By October, it had ceded the title of biggest mutual fund to an offering from Vanguard Group Inc. The Pimco fund has been reduced in size to $143.4 billion as of Dec. 31.

The case is Kenny v. Pacific Investment Management Co., 14-01987, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington (Seattle).