What About Genomics and Workers Comp?

August 16, 2022 by William Wilt and Kirk Hartley

William Wilt and Kirk Hartley, the authors of the accompanying article, “Have Insurers Paid Too Much for Asbestos and Other Toxic Torts?” recently published a research note, in a Q&A format, highlighting the potential impacts that forthcoming waves of genomic data could have on toxic tort litigation.

In the excerpts below, Wilt asks Hartley about workers compensation impacts and litigation involving plaintiffs who are smokers.

William Wilt

Wilt: Many of our readers will work for insurers where workers compensation is an important product. In turn, we’re aware that states are increasingly passing legislation where it must be presumed that certain cancers (or other diseases) are the result of occupational exposure (i.e., the burden to prove otherwise falls on the employer). Fire fighters and a variety of cancers come to mind.

Do genomic analyses have a role to play here?

Hartley: Yes, absolutely. For example, some of the cancers at issue in the firefighting foam MDL (e.g., testicular cancers) are often associated with genetic abnormalities. Also, the issues go beyond cancer and include, for example, degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s. As an example of the latter, fact sheets in use in the paraquat MDL 9 (In re Paraquat Prods. Liab. Lit., 21-MD-3004 (S.D. IL.) call for disclosure of genetic testing data.

Wilt: Shifting the focus to smoking; we all know it’s bad! But it sounds like there is some potential breakthrough data that could link it to myriad diseases. If that’s true, what does it mean for defendants in personal injury cases?

Kirk Hartley

Hartley: You are light years ahead of the pack in asking the question. In short, yes, “signature mutations” for tobacco-induced cancers have been identified and published in top-tier scientific journals by internationally respected researchers. And, recently, researchers have even acknowledged that smoking plays a role in some mesotheliomas.

To date, I’ve seen only a handful of personal injury cases where a party argued the presence of a signature mutation. However, I certainly am encouraging more parties to be aware of and explore the use of signature mutation patterns to prove smoking (or other toxicants) as the cause of a cancer or other disease/condition.

This excerpt is being published by Carrier Management with permission from the authors.

[inline-ad-1]