CFO Attacks Industry Reserve-Cheating Theory

February 14, 2013

The chief financial officer of ACE Group challenged the popular theory that property/casualty insurers “cheat” on loss reserves as they work through market cycles during a presentation at an industry conference last year.Executive SummaryReserving philosophy and management integrity in setting reserves were key themes of comments from carrier executives and board members speaking at a recent financial symposium. Speakers offered advice to audit committees about hiring outside actuarial firms and asking the right questions, while a carrier executive challenged theories of cyclical earnings management through reserve actions.

Executive Summary

Reserving philosophy and management integrity in setting reserves were key themes of comments from carrier executives and board members speaking at a recent financial symposium. Speakers offered advice to audit committees about hiring outside actuarial firms and asking the right questions, while a carrier executive challenged theories of cyclical earnings management through reserve actions.

“There are people that say there’s a reserving cycle—that as the market softens, reserves soften, and as the market hardens, reserves get more conservative. I don’t believe that generalization,” said Philip Bancroft, chief financial officer of ACE Group, speaking to executives and students during a session of the St. Joseph’s University Insurance Financial Symposium last year.

“You have to understand a particular company’s reserving methodology and philosophy,” Bancroft said, noting that at ACE, it is considered very important to have a reasonable estimate of the reserves.